C2 Writing Test - AI Governance & Democratic Accountability
Free C2 Writing practice on AI governance and accountability—advanced prompts, thesis frames, and academic vocabulary to strengthen coherence and analysis.
Complete the paragraph by filling 8 blanks with suitable terms from the Word bank. Write one word/phrase per blank.
Word bank (choose 8)
data governance • explainability • audit trails • due process • sandboxing • codes of conduct • oversight • accountability
AI Governance & Democratic Accountability: Rights by Design
To protect rights upstream, rules should mandate robust [1] over training data, retention, and third-party inputs. When models inform credit or welfare decisions, authorities must require [2] that ordinary users can understand. Without verifiable [3] , investigations stall and responsibility becomes blurred. Individuals deserve administrative [4] with timely notice and an effective appeal path. To encourage innovation safely, regulators can allow supervised [5] with clear exit criteria, while sector bodies publish enforceable [6] aligned with statute. An independent [7] body should track systemic risks and publish incident reports. Ultimately, legal [8] - not voluntary pledges - ensures harms are prevented rather than apologised for.
Complete the paragraph by filling 8 blanks with suitable terms from the Word bank. Write one word/phrase per blank.
Word bank (choose 8)
proportionality • algorithmic transparency • impact assessments • contestability • accountability • oversight • audits • redress mechanisms
AI Governance & Democratic Accountability: From Principles to Enforcement
Effective AI governance must translate ideals into enforceable rules. First, high-risk systems should undergo rigorous [1] and publish clear model cards to enhance [2] . Independent [3] and public registers are needed so researchers can verify safety claims. When automated decisions affect livelihoods, users must have [4] to challenge outcomes and seek [5] , not merely opaque appeals. Regulators should apply [6] and risk-tiering, ensuring start-ups innovate while powerful platforms face stricter duties. To deter performative compliance, laws must tie [7] to executives, with penalties for concealment and biased deployment. Ultimately, democratic [8] - through parliament, courts, and civil society - keeps governance responsive as capabilities evolve.