C2 Writing Test - Free Speech, Harm, and Platform Governance
Free C2 Writing practice on free speech and platform governance—high-level prompts, legal-policy lexis, and rebuttal strategies to boost cohesion.
Complete the paragraph with one word per blank.
Word bank (choose 8)
amplification - absolutism - proportionality - necessity - disinformation - accountability - appeals - transparency
Free Speech, Harm, and Platform Governance: Drawing the Line in the Algorithmic Age
Debates over digital “free speech” often polarize between libertarian and harm-reduction pragmatism. Critics note that platforms’ outsized influence stems from algorithmic , not mere hosting, which can turbocharge networked and translate into offline harms. A principled framework would reject viewpoint favoritism while applying content-neutral limits anchored in and tests. Procedurally, users deserve notice, reasons, and workable mechanisms to curb arbitrariness. Structural reforms—independent audits, data , and virality “circuit breakers”—can target spread without policing ideas. Ultimately, durable legitimacy requires multi-stakeholder that balances state oversight with platform responsibility and user rights.
Complete the paragraph with one word per blank.
Word bank (choose 8)
transparency - architect - audit - assessment - proportional - accountability - circuit-breakers - heuristic
While platforms insist they are neutral conduits, their design choices incentives that privilege engagement over accuracy. In such environments, outrage becomes a reliable , and moderation that is purely reactive struggles to keep pace. A credible governance stack should combine risk , tiered interventions against likely harm, and review to prevent overreach. Crucially, rules must be content-neutral, applied consistently, and auditable through data mandates. Critics warn that stronger tooling chills speech; yet narrowly tailored measures - rate limits, friction, and for virality-target spread rather than ideas. To protect due process, platforms should publish clear rationales, preserve trails, and offer meaningful appeals. In the long run, legitimacy rests on shared among regulators, firms, and users about what constitutes unacceptable risk.